My Tiny Dick Forums

My Tiny Dick Forums (http://mytinydick.net/talk/index.php)
-   Suggestions & Feedback (http://mytinydick.net/talk/forumdisplay.php?f=11)
-   -   How about making this forum "private"? (http://mytinydick.net/talk/showthread.php?t=1693)

hoverfly 01-04-2011 10:02 PM

How about making this forum "private"?
 
A few days ago I noticed a post about someones picture and extracts of their posts having been posted on another site. If I remember correctly, the site was not particulary "small penis friendly".

How about making the forum private, so only member actually get to see either pics or posts.

Anyway, I for the time being have deleted my pics. I am not into being abused on someones website. Also, if not already the case, there should be a passage in the T&C's about confidentiality and copyright of the post/pics remaining with the poster, maybe with the added hint that any such breach would be liable to prosecution.

An open forum is an open invitation to abuse it seems. You should respect peoples privacy by helping to protect your members.

Thanks for you attention.

barelythere 01-04-2011 11:19 PM

I agree

minuteman 01-06-2011 01:27 AM

Agreed hoverfly. However, on this forum, that won't happen before hell freezes over...

hoverfly 01-07-2011 10:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by minuteman (Post 8997)
Agreed hoverfly. However, on this forum, that won't happen before hell freezes over...

Minuteman: You may be right but on the other hand... let's give the guys a chance to prove us wrong. I guess it may all have to do with how much you know about running a forum, set up its functions, etc. so there may be technical difficulties behind some of the delays that I have read about.

I'm not a member of the paysite, don't believe in paying for porn/sex but I did gather there were/are some issues with updates. I have often wondered whether or not the guy in the porn clips might not actually be the one running this forum as well. Would make sense, you could save money on either actors or admins.

Whatever.

smallcocked 01-09-2011 06:31 AM

i think that the pictures and videos section should be made private :) the other can be left viewable by everyone.

hoverfly 01-12-2011 09:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by smallcocked (Post 9117)
i think that the pictures and videos section should be made private :) the other can be left viewable by everyone.

I'd prefer the whole thing to be shut off from the "public" but I'd be quite happy to settle for your suggestion.

hoverfly 01-13-2011 11:42 PM

On second thoughts...
 
... I am unsure but it may be easier to enforce a rule that only coded links are permitted.

If you open a live (clickable) link on a page, your browser send a referrer that contains information about where you came from, ie. which, if any page requested the new one. Web analyser software seeks such information and prestents it to the webmaster who can then decide on what to do with that information.

Here's how a coded link should look:
Code:

www.nasa.gov
To achieve this, type the link in or paste it
Highlight the link
Click on the "#" button at the top of the toolbar
Done and dusted

Furthermore, a good tracker software will track you IP address right back to wherever you may have accessed the site from, so watch it if you feel tempted to access this site from work.

On that note, always remember you leave your footprints everywhere.

jobleau 01-14-2011 12:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hoverfly (Post 9283)
On that note, always remember you leave your footprints everywhere.

Quite right. Contrarily to what most people believe, anonymity does not exist on the internet. Everything you do can be, and sometimes is, tracked, even if you are using obfuscating techniques. They do make it more difficult to track you but it still possible. And most people don't use these because they don't even know they exist.

ricemaster 01-29-2011 05:19 AM

This is a good idea, i`ll make the pics/vids sections private, so people need to register in order to see them.

hoverfly 01-29-2011 08:44 AM

Thank you very much for your response ricemaster. Also, I would suggest making it a rule to post only live links that stay inside the forum as suggested two posts up.

Thanks again.

ricemaster 01-29-2011 01:50 PM

Now Pics/Videos are private and non regged users cant see it.

hoverfly 01-29-2011 10:01 PM

Thank you very much, Ricemaster.

oldguyunder5 01-29-2011 10:18 PM

Thanks ricemaster, now we have some privacy which lead me to post some pics.:D

jobleau 01-30-2011 03:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ricemaster (Post 9689)
Now Pics/Videos are private and non regged users cant see it.

Excellent move. Thanks.

ricemaster 01-30-2011 09:04 AM

Enjoy guys ;)

minuteman 02-08-2011 02:30 PM

@ricemaster

Any chance of you fixing all the other problems that have been flagged-up to you over the last year?

ricemaster 02-08-2011 09:51 PM

I Believe we did fix all the security token issues, anything more i left out? please point me to them and i`ll get them fixed for you guys.

minuteman 02-14-2011 01:11 PM

Please check the several PMs I sent you and smallcocked. Main problems are security token stuff and unable to post/view messages in the Social Groups.

M

ricemaster 02-14-2011 06:03 PM

Is it still hapening? i was sure we fixed it all.

minuteman 02-14-2011 11:45 PM

"Error 400 - bad request" Same old messages as before. (Before you ask, I get the same result on Firefox and IE8).

Little Dick 02-15-2011 03:18 PM

well i used to face some issues earlier... nothing as of late... minuteman... tried clearing the cache and cookies??? i suppose u have... if not then try tat... and if that too doesnt work... try flushing ur dns... thats if ur using windows.

minuteman 02-16-2011 11:38 PM

I'd flush the friggin toilet if I thought it would help...

ALL the old problems are STILL THERE - accessing social groups, security tokens missing, the lot

Little Dick 02-17-2011 07:06 PM

minuteman... yes they r back... FFS its getting a little annoying now... i mean this issue started back again for me this mornin and its past mid nite for me and im still having the same issue :(

Little Dick 02-17-2011 07:07 PM

1 Attachment(s)
FFS its annoying now


Attachment 2717

hoverfly 02-17-2011 11:07 PM

Hi you guys, looks like they are having real problems configuring the software. I only know too well what that feels like, I admin a forum that was run by a bunch of inept cretins that messed the whole setup up. So, you might as well offer your assistance, should you really be familiar with such issues and I don't mean configuring a local windows installation but a) an Apache server and b) the board software including all the relevant security issues.

Don't ask me, I'll be busy on our site for some time yet.

ricemaster 02-19-2011 06:23 PM

I`ll try checking it out again asap, sorry for the delay guys :(

hoverfly 09-12-2011 11:17 AM

May I again request that the whole forum be made 'private'? I know, the pic/vid section has been private for a while but personally, I don't think that that's sufficient.

Google can happily read all your posts and algorithms are smart enough to analyse usernames and references made to other nicks used outside this forum for them to be able to build up a nice database of who and what you are or claim to be.

As I said in another post, I do co-run a doc forum as admin and it is easy enough to set 'Guest' account priviliges to be able to only see the content of the forum, yet deny access to the posts content, which is what I'd be keen on.

You still get almost the same exposure on google, if that is what you are after, building up your membership numbers, but at least what people feel is private, stays private, unless of course you forget to assign bots to the 'Guest' priviliges ruleset.

I don't know how often google comes by here but I know for a fact that on our site, google pretty much reads every post in realtime, allthough it only gets as far as the post title.

Also, are member profiles visible to bots? This, if it was the case, should also be dealt with, unless it was when the forum was set up.

Just my two cents worth on privacy.

hoverfly 09-15-2011 03:26 PM

Maybe you can dangle the carrot of not having to flush the spider logs all the time before him. LOL

It is always possible that admin does want the google and other spider exposure. On our forum we let them go about their business for several weeks after it had been set up originally and then shut them out. Main reason was that despite all efforts google still managed to get into the member profile section and some had posted their email so it was visible also to non-admins. Bad move.

Also, somewhere I noticed that you had made a post about deleting spam and spammers. Is that much of a problem? If so, I'd suggest you register with
and get an API key that can then be used to make autoqueries of IP, email and username (not much use but it can be done) when a new member registers. One hit, member is auto-referred for admin approval, two hits and pop goes the weasel, meaning, instant ban and IP blocking. The one hit can be adapted, ie. if it is the IP that fails the check, instant ban, email can always be abused.

Thought that might come in helpful. We've reduced spammers by roughly 98%, the 2% that slip the net... well, nothing is foolproof but this one is pretty close.

hoverfly 09-18-2011 09:38 AM

Thanks tiny. Yes, implementing the changes I suggested does require you to have full access to the ACP, as it involves changing the source code of a couple of scripts.

I've not worked with VBulletin before, so I can't comment on how easily this could be done, we use IP.Board from IPS. At least there, should someone mess up, you can always reset the altered scripts to their original status.

Anyway, thanks for passing it on and that spam database is pretty good but like with everything else, it is always only a reaction to something, never a proactive approach.

hoverfly 09-21-2011 10:19 AM

Thanks for all your efforts, Tiny, much appreciated. Time will tell, won't it?

drew 09-24-2011 02:26 PM

mtd.net has pretty good e-filtration,


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:07 AM.


(c) Ninja Dollars