greatsayaman

Foreskins = protect your cock, look good (again, some like it, some don't, but the people who don't only dislike it 'cause their first cock was uncut. xD)... and uh... PROTECTS THE MOST SENSITIVE, PLEASURABLE AREA OF YOUR BODY!!!

I'd rather keep my sensitivity and have epic, explosive orgasms that have me shivering... than just substandard orgasms. ;D

hoverfly

That last sentence is a bit of a sweeping statement. I'm uncut, not really a cultural thing where I come from but I wouldn't think that a circumcised penis leads to having a less then fulfilling climax.

greatsayaman

You should read up on foreskins then. Basically without one your cock head is constantly rubbing against your clothes and shit, which eventually leads to damaged nerves and sensitivity loss, and what not. So yes, the orgasm isn't quite as fulfilling.

SmallOregonDick

I'm cut and my nuts always feel amazing and usually leave a nice load.

greatsayaman

Imagine how much better it'd feel with all the nerves, then.

hoverfly

As Bindicat wrote in an earlier reply, I too don't have the comparisson, since I am uncut. I could find out, something that someone that is cut can't. So, neither will ever have the experience and I'd be curious how science could meassure the 'quality' of an orgasm.

Do we really always have to chase better performance? Some things are simply best enjoyed.

jobleau

Sorry to say so, but that is a legend. To my knowledge, there are no scientific study that proves an uncut cock is more sensitive than a cut one.

Nerves in your body can be hurt by several factors indeed. But stating that having a sheeted cock head makes it more sensitive is pure fallacy. The nerves in your cock head won't get less sensitive because you're cut and it rubs on your underwear no less than the nerves in your hand will get less sensitive if you wear gloves or the ones in your feet will because you wear socks.

In reality, cut men will actually experience more discomfort than uncut men because of that. But definitely not less sensitivity. And I'm sure all cut men here can attest to have had "explosive orgasms" rather than "just substandard orgasms". And on that subject, cut or not, your orgasms strength will vary from time to time because of many factors.

That is not how a human body works, period. So please get your facts straight instead of speaking thru your hat.

Disclaimer: I am cut.

BindiCat

I would say that a person who was cut as a baby is still going to have a good orgasm. But since it's the only orgasm they've known, they can't compare it to anything else. Same with uncut guys. And yes, each orgasm is going to be a bit different from the last one.

However, it's not that the nerves in the cock head change in sensitivity at all, it's that being exposed all the time builds up a callous of sorts on the cock head, which is said to dull sensitivity. However, the foreskin itself contains a ton of nerves, so by cutting it off you're losing all of them.

jobleau

I happen to have a friend who got circumcised in his early forties (he's now close to 60) and last time I saw him I asked him what difference he could feel. His answer was that it feels a bit different but just as good. The biggest difference, he mentioned, is that the head is always uncovered upon entering, which was not always the case when he was uncut, and that is something he particularly liked.